Sarah Jessica Parker has denied rumours that she has had her famous mole removed. When the Sex and the City star made an appearance at a baseball game in New York recently it appeared the distinctive mole had been replaced by a tiny mark. Such was the speculation in yesterday's newspapers, SJP got her spokesperson to set the record straight, with them telling reporters, "Nothing has been removed."

SOURCE: IMDB.COM(17/07/2008)

Nevertheless, many pundits still believe she has ditched the mole and in response to this story, today's Sun newspaper has an excellent little article on 'A brief history of the beauty spot.'   http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/woman/article1437997.ece

Lozza wrote hmmm i went to the cinema to watch Sex and the City, I can't remember if it was there or not. But come to think of it i think no it wasnt lol.

Cant remember if it was there or not either, i wouldnt really call it a trademark mole though, how can a mole be a trademark

If her mole was a trademark, why would she have it taken off?  The fact that we are posting about this in a forum shows that people pay attention to this sort of thing.  Now if the mole had suddenly grown and gotten misshapened, that would be a good reason to have it removed.  Other than a reason like that, I doubt that she had anything deliberately done to it.